There is a strong indication that little attention is paid to the compatibility and effectiveness of integrating information system in the pre-merger and acquisition planning As business strategy For example, it is also important to understand how each firm generates productivity reports, and what the key components of management reports are. For example, one firm may consider the originating partner as the key factor while another may treat the billing partner or responsible partner designation as having greater significance. In this case, it may be necessary in the conversion process to change originating partner to responsible partner before merging the data in order to conform to an existing management preference. It is clear that mergers and acquisitions will continue to play a major part in the global business environment as a method for achieving organizational strategic goals. Investment in information system infrastructure is also increasing, as is its underlying value to the organization. Given the focus and economic investment in technology infrastructure by organizations of all sizes in different sectors, information system integration in the pre and post phases of any merger are clearly a key factor for success in unlocking the benefits of the combined entity. References: Merali, Y. and McKiernan, P. The Strategic Positioning of Information Systems in Post-acquisition Management, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol 2, No 2 (1993) pp105-124. Bank Merger: Fit, Compatibility and Models of Change, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol 5 (1996), pp 189-211. Stair R., Reynolds, G. (2006). “Principles of Information Systems Thomson Course Tech |
Should Firms Consider the Compatibility of their Information Systems' During Merger or Acquisition? ?
Tags
Information Systems
Social: